It is somewhat safe to say that the OWEbama administration has been known for its “quick” responses to what it believes, rightly or more often than not wrongly, have been “crises” effecting the nation.
We are now suffering under the withering effects of the “Scamulous”, the bank bailouts, the takeovers of formerly capitalist enterprises and most importantly, the “Health Scare Scam”.. If, according to OWEbama, they haven’t been “dealt with” rapidly enough, the hue and cry from both he and his Marxist minions has been to “hurry up”.. The theory utilized by the left appears to be, “it’s not important that we do it right, let’s just do it..”
OWEbama has focused on the “need for speed”.. With the happy go lucky/spend it now, print it later liberals in charge, this proven to be an unmitigated disaster. The theory of being “fast and furious” hasn’t played out well.. The ATF’s (What did Holder know and when did he know it?) “Operation Fast and Furious”, the idea of allowing 2,500 guns to be funneled into the hands of Mexican criminals and its hideous failure, seems a very apt metaphor for the entire OWEbama experiment..
Now OWEbama is off on yet another vacation and there he will be mulling over ANOTHER “jobs creation” measure. He will get back to the nation that has suffered through his permanent ten percent unemployment rate once his swim fins and socialist snorkeling gear dries out..
The genuine unemployment “crisis”, a “crisis” of HIS making no less, and now he seems to want to take his time about responding it. This “take your time” theory can be best exposed along side OWEbama’s five month “delayed reaction” to the genuine “crisis” in Syria while his trumped up, Congressionally UNapproved “crisis” and “hurry up shadow war” in Libya churns on.. (Without protest from the peaceniks of the left as well..)
Based upon OWEbama’s “historic” record of “accomplishment”, is it the “rate of speed” that has been his downfall or has it been his complete ineptitude and indifference? When dealing with “crises”, has his reliance upon historically failed socialism caused his endless failures or has it been the “timeframe” of his response?
Seems silly of me to ask, doesn’t it?