What a shock it was to learn that Obama thinks that Chavez and Castro are right. Obama said that the ousting of Manuel Zelaya, a “populist” (socialist) from Honduras was “illegal and would set a terrible precedence of transition by military force..”
The King of the Universe said, “We (who is this “we”?) believe that Zelaya remains the president of Honduras..” Is this more of the “meddling” that he didn’t want to get involved with last week with Iran? Obama’s opinions in matters pertaining to Honduras are irrelevant.
Zelaya was overthrown in a dawn coup on Sunday after he “angered the judiciary”. Obama has no worries on that front, our thoroughly domesticated liberal “judiciary” would never think to disagree with the “Destroy America First” communist crowd in Washington..
Our Secretary of State would not formally call it a “coup” because by doing so, all of the money being sent to Honduras will have to be stopped by law. The State Department has requested $68.2 million dollars for this country for fiscal 2010.. It would be nice to know what this 68 million will be getting us.. Lets call it a “coup” that way Obama can say that he has “saved” 68.2 million dollars”, not unlike his “save a million jobs” malarkey.. (Sidebar: he has lost one and a half million jobs since he decide to “save the economy”..)
Dopey Robert Gibbs, media marionette for Obama said, “Our goal is on restoring democratic order in Honduras..” While you are at it Booby, could you see about “restoring democratic order” here in the Socialist States of Amerika?
Rodham said, “If we were able to get to a status quo that returned to the rule of law..” Just the other day, Pelosi decried “the entrenched agents of the status quo” relative to those with the common sense to oppose the Obama Socialist regime and its idiotic global warming bankrupting blitzkrieg.. Here the “status quo” is fine because it would restore “order” to the country of Honduras as demanded by the hegemony in Amerika and his two fascist familiars in Central America.
We are now “meddling” in the affairs of Honduras since the fellow fascists Obama, Chavez and Castro (Obama is just hedging his bets in order to receive another wonderful present from Chavez the next time that they get to mug and make out for the cameras..) believe that we should, yet Obama didn’t want to seem to be “meddling” in the affairs of Iran, a country that BEGS for some “meddling” a week ago.. Sidebar for extra credit: Do you think that there is there any chance that the Iranian cries for freedom had anything to do with the freedom of Iraq? (YES!!) I just think of it as the “Osmotic Effects of Democracy”..
A country wants to be rid of a leftist “populist” (Zelaya doesn’t look that popular to me based on current events..) dictator and Obama says, “Foul!!”. Would this have been his response if the Iranian uprising had toppled Leisure Suit Larry? Think back to what another President did in a similar situation and what Obama would have done in that same situation..
June 12, 1987. President Reagan, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!”.. Obama at the Brandenburg Gate, November 9, 1989 as the Berlin Wall fell: “Mr. Gorbechev, put this wall back up!”
“It would be a terrible precedent if we start moving backwards..” Here Obama is referring to the Honduran situation. Keep in mind that the “terrible precedence” of “moving backwards” here in America has been his “top priority” since January 20th.. It is just another “terrible precedent” by a “terrible president”..